Sustainability and Climate Risk Data A New Era for Investment Decision-Making in the Age of Climate Change

Main Article Content

David Marczis
Zsolt Mihálovits
Géza Sebestyén


As economic actors face increasing pressure to be socially responsible and environmentally conscious, investors look beyond traditional financial metrics and seek data to support their decision-making. Measuring and reporting sustainability and climate risks is a relatively new discipline with several interrelations to economic, financial, risk management, and other cognitive study areas such as climate sciences, and have come a long way in the last couple of years. We are in the middle of the evolutionary process, as data availability and coverage are much better than a decade ago. However, there is still a lot to do until the new metrics and indicators are fully embedded in risk management frameworks and decision-making processes, similar to traditional risk measures. In our essay, we will explore the role of third-party data vendors for sustainability, ESG, and climate risk-related information, their importance in the modern investing world, and review the major challenges. We give an insight into the evolution of the market of data vendors and also the regulatory landscape. Finally, we explore the unique roles of central banks and their challenges in implementing actions in sustainability.

Article Details

How to Cite
Marczis, D., Mihálovits, Z. ., & Sebestyén, G. (2023). Sustainability and Climate Risk Data: A New Era for Investment Decision-Making in the Age of Climate Change. Cognitive Sustainability, 2(2).


Avetisyan, E., Hockerts, K. (2017). The consolidation of the ESG rating industry as an enactment of institutional retrogression. Busi-ness Strategy and the Environment. 26(3), 316–330. DOI:

Blackrock (2021), European Commission, Directorate-General for Financial Stability, Financial Services and Capital Markets Union. Development of tools and mechanisms for the integration of ESG factors into the EU banking prudential framework and in-to banks’ business strategies and investment policies – Final study. Publications Office. DOI:

Bokor, L. (2022). Regulatory-market trends for ESG bonds and funds and some of the associated risks for sovereigns. [in Hungarian: ESG-kötvények és -alapok szabályozói-piaci trendjei, valamint a szuverének egyes kapcsolódó kockázatai]. Financial And Economic Review. [in Hungarian: Hitelintézeti Szemle].21(4):152–181.

Cantor, R., Packer, F. (1995). The credit rating industry. The Journal of Fixed Income. 5(3), 10–34. DOI:

de Freitas Netto, S. V., Sobral, M. F. F., Ribeiro, A. R. B., Soares, G. R. D. L. (2020). Concepts and forms of greenwashing: A systematic review. Environmental Sciences Europe. 32(1), 1–12. DOI:

European Banking Authority (EBA) (2022). Final draft implementing technical standards (ITS) on Pillar 3 disclosures on ESG risks. URL:

Fisher, P.G. (2020). Making the Financial System Sustainable. Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 9781108908269 p330.

Giese, G., Nagy Z., Cote, C. (2021). Constructing Net-Zero Portfolios: Three Approaches. MSCI ESG Research. URL:

Harper, S. (2011). Credit rating agencies deserve credit for the 2007–2008 financial crisis: An analysis of CRA liability following the enactment of the Dodd-Frank Act. Washington & Lee Law Review. 68(4). URL:

Jacobs, B. I., Levy, K. N. (2022). The Challenge of Disparities in ESG Ratings. The Journal of Impact and ESG Investing, 2(3):107–111. DOI:

Kalesnik, V., Wilkens, M., Zink, J. (2022). Do Corporate Carbon Emissions Data Enable Investors to Mitigate Climate Change? The Journal of Portfolio Management. 48(10), 119–147. DOI:

Kolozsi, P. P., Ladányi, S., Straubinger, A. (2022). Measuring the Climate Risk Exposure of Financial Assets – Methodological Chal-lenges and Central Bank Practices. Financial and Economic Review. 21(1), 113–140. DOI:

Kumar, R., Wallace, N., Funk, C. (2020). Mainstream: ESG at the Tipping Point. Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Govern-ance, January 13, 2020. URL:

Lopez, C., Contreras, O., Bendix, J. (2020). Disagreement among ESG rating agencies: Shall we be worried? URL:

Mähner, M. (2021). Porter’s 5 Forces, Analysis of the SaaS ESG Tracking / Reporting Industry. URL:

Manasses G, Tapaszti A., Paulik É (2022). Green Bond Impact Report as an indispensable next step in market development, [in Hun-garian: Zöldkötvény-hatásjelentés mint elengedhetetlen következő lépés a piaci fejlődésben]. Credit Institutions Review [in Hungarian: Hitelintézeti Szemle], 21(4):182–206. DOI:

Marczis D. (2022). A 12.000 milliárd dolláros kérdés, avagy a jegybanki devizatartalékok zöldítésének dilemmái [The $12,000 billion question, or the dilemmas of greening central bank foreign exchange reserves]. Economania. URL:

Mittal, R., Dordoeva, B., Ohlale, H. (2022). Mapping the ESG Landscape: Complexities, Complications and Considerations. Synechron. URL:

MNB (2022a). The Magyar Nemzeti Bank’s climate-related financial disclosure. URL:

MNB (2022b). Green Finance Report. URL:

NFRD – The Non-Financial Reporting Directive) (2014). URL:

Peacock, A. l, Marino I (2022). New pillar 3 ESG risks requirements to offer a partial snapshot of banks’ transition. Natixis Green and Sustainable Hub. URL:

TCFD – Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (2022). 2022 Status Report. URL: