Main Article Content
Since the 1990s, articles have widely used MAC curves to analyse the best alternatives in terms of cost-effectiveness when deciding to abate a negative externality. Most of the articles are related to CO2 abatement as the main externality to be reduced, and the main advantages and disadvantages of the MACC tool are presented in the literature review presented here. Finally, it is determined whether the curve is a definitive method for analysing and elaborating policy and business decisions or whether the tool needs to correct the methodology to increase the scientific consensus.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access). As soon as the paper is accepted, finally submitted and edited, the paper will appear in the "OnlineFirst" page of the journal, thus from this point no other internet-based publication is necessary.
Du, L., Mao, J. (2015). Estimating the environmental efficiency and marginal CO2 abatement cost of coal-fired power plants in China. Energy Policy. 85, 347–356. DOI: https://doi.org/ghdjmm
Ghislanzoni, G., Myerson, G., Ragani, A. F. (2013). A cost-effective path to road safety. McKinsey Report.
Kesicki, F. (2013). Marginal abatement cost curves: Combining energy system modelling and decomposition analysis. Environmental Modeling & Assessment. 18, 27–37. DOI: https://doi.org/f4jbcf
Kesicki, F., Ekins, P. (2012). Marginal abatement cost curves: a call for caution. Climate Policy. 12(2), 219–236. DOI: https://doi.org/dttdtr
Kesicki, F., Strachan, N. (2011). Marginal abatement cost (MAC) curves: confronting theory and practice. Environmental Science & Policy. 14(8), 1195–1204. DOI: https://doi.org/b2xzp4
Tomaschek, J. (2015). Marginal abatement cost curves for policy recommendation – A method for energy system analysis. Energy Policy. 85, 376–385. DOI: https://doi.org/f725dj
Wächter, P. (2013). The usefulness of marginal CO2-e abatement cost curves in Austria. Energy Policy. 61, 1116–1126. DOI: https://doi.org/f5gw6v
Ward, D. J. (2014). The failure of marginal abatement cost curves in optimising a transition to a low carbon energy supply. Energy Policy. 73, 820–822. DOI: https://doi.org/gkptsj
Xiao, H., Wei, Q., Wang, H. (2014). Marginal abatement cost and carbon reduction potential outlook of key energy efficiency technologies in China׳ s building sector to 2030. Energy Policy. 69, 92-105. DOI: https://doi.org/f55cdm
Zhou, X., Fan, L. W., Zhou, P. (2015). Marginal CO2 abatement costs: Findings from alternative shadow price estimates for Shanghai industrial sectors. Energy Policy. 77, 109–117. DOI: https://doi.org/f6zw9j