Main Article Content
The adoption of fuel-efficient vehicles, especially battery electric vehicles (BEVs), is becoming an emerging priority on the global level. At first, it may seem that the major issue from the consumer side is the high price of BEVs that are not competitive with internal combustion (IC) vehicles. However, aspects like technological developments, battery safety measures, implemented safety features, design, range anxiety, charging infrastructure, environmental consciousness and sustainability also play a significant role in the decision-making process of BEV purchasing. This paper examines the connection between BEV registrations and Hungary's available public charging infrastructure. Data on the number of new BEV registrations, public charging stations and energy consumption from public charging are gathered for each county and region in Hungary. Until 2020, a division between the Eastern and Western parts of the country can be detected considering BEV adoption, but in 2021 this difference will diminish. Even though it can be seen from the raw data that the number of BEV registrations is growing faster than the number of available charging stations, existing stations prove to be properly located, covering regions that either have high BEV registrations or are part of transit paths with high traffic. Also, it is shown that BEV registrations grow proportionately higher in regions where more charging stations are available.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access). As soon as the paper is accepted, finally submitted and edited, the paper will appear in the "OnlineFirst" page of the journal, thus from this point no other internet-based publication is necessary.
Adepetu, A., Keshav, S. (2017). The relative importance of price and driving range on electric vehicle adoption: Los Angeles case study. Transportation, 44, 353–373. DOI: https://doi.org/f9vhtc
Anselin, L., Li, X. (2020). Tobler’s law in a multivariate world. Geographical Analysis, 52(4), 494–510. DOI: https://doi.org/ggw5xd
Eberle, U., von Helmolt, R. (2010). Sustainable transportation based on electric vehicle concepts: a brief overview. Energy Environmental Science, 3(6), 689–699. DOI: https://doi.org/c9dzx8
Horváth, P., Nyerges, Á. (2022). Design aspects for in-vehicle IPM motors for sustainable mobility. Cognitive Sustainability, 1(1). DOI: https://doi.org/jm9m
KSH – Hungarian Central Statistical Office. Road vehicle fleet by county and region, 31 December. URL: https://www.ksh.hu/stadat_files/sza/en/sza0040.html
MEKH – Hungarian Energy and Public Utility Regulatory Authority (2021). Summary report on data collected by the Hungarian Energy and Public Utility Regulatory Office on electromobility. [in Hungarian: Összefoglaló jelentés a Magyar Energetikai és Közműszabályozási Hivatal elektromobilitás tárgyban gyűjtött adatairól]. URL: http://www.mekh.hu/download/3/0d/e0000/osszefoglalo_jelentes_mekh_elektromobilitas.pdf
MEKH – Hungarian Energy and Public Utility Regulatory Authority (2022). Report on electrical charging equipment subject to authorisation [in Hungarian: Beszámoló az engedélyköteles elektromos töltőberendezésekről – 2022. II. Negyedév]. URL: http://www.mekh.hu/beszamolo-az-engedelykoteles-elektromos-toltoberendezesekrol-2022-ii-negyedev
Illmann, U., Kluge, J. (2020). Public charging infrastructure and the market diffusion of electric vehicles. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 86, 102413. DOI: https://doi.org/j4n9
Li, W., Long, R., Chen, H., Geng, J. (2017). A review of factors influencing consumer intentions to adopt battery electric vehicles. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 78, 318–328. DOI: https://doi.org/gbszqm
Lucas, A., Prettico, G., Flammini, M. G., Kotsakis, E., Fulli, G., Masera, M. (2018). Indicator-based methodology for assessing EV charging infrastructure using exploratory data analysis. Energies, 11(7), 1869. DOI: https://doi.org/gd66j9
Noel, L., de Rubens, G. Z., Sovacool, B. K., Kester, J. (2019). Fear and loathing of electric vehicles: The reactionary rhetoric of range anxiety. Energy Research Social Science, 48, 96–107. DOI: https://doi.org/j4pb
Noel, L., de Rubens, G. Z., Kester, J., Sovacool, B. K. (2020). Understanding the socio-technical nexus of Nordic electric vehicle (EV) barriers: A qualitative discussion of range, price, charging and knowledge. Energy Policy, 138, 111292. DOI: https://doi.org/gh5v7c
Pevec, D., Babic, J., Carvalho, A., Ghiassi-Farrokhfal, Y., Ketter, W., Podobnik, V. (2019, June). Electric vehicle range anxiety: An obstacle for the personal transportation (r) evolution?. 2019 4th International Conference on Smart and Sustainable Technologies (SPLITECH). IEEE. 1–8. DOI: https://doi.org/ghs7d3
Zöldy, M., Baranyi, P. (2023). The Cognitive Mobility Concept. Infocommunications Journal, 15(Special issue), 35–40. DOI: https://doi.org/j4pc