Environmental process maturity: A sustainable theoretical framework for Polish ports
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Ports are critical nodes in global trade and logistics, playing a vital role in the sustainability agenda due to their significant environmental and social impacts. Despite increasing attention to sustainability, there is limited research on frameworks that holistically assess the environmental process maturity of ports, especially in the context of Polish ports. This study aims to address the gap by proposing a conceptual model to assess the environmental process maturity of ports, integrating environmental performance, stakeholder engagement, and regulatory alignment. The model focuses on providing actionable insights for port authorities to enhance sustainability. The study employs a conceptual approach, synthesising information from sustainability frameworks, Corporate and Social Responsibility (CSR) models, and maturity assessments. Key constructs are operationalised through specific indicators to evaluate maturity levels across five progressive stages – Initial, Developing, Established, Integrated, and Optimised. The model is tailored to the unique challenges of Polish ports and contextualised within broader European Union sustainability goals. The proposed model bridges the gap between theoretical sustainability principles and practical applications. It provides a structured framework to evaluate and improve environmental processes, offering a roadmap for ports to transition from basic compliance to strategic environmental leadership. The model's adaptability enables benchmarking and alignment with global best practices. This study contributes to the discourse on sustainable port management by introducing an integrative framework for assessing environmental process maturity. It provides theoretical advancements and practical tools for enhancing port sustainability performance, particularly in Polish and European contexts.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access). As soon as the paper is accepted, finally submitted and edited, the paper will appear in the "OnlineFirst" page of the journal, thus from this point no other internet-based publication is necessary.
References
Argyriou, I., Sifakis, N., Tsoutsos, T. (2019). Developing an integrated environmental policy for ports using Multicriteria Decision Making Analysis. In Charalambopoulos, D. A. (ed.), 5th International Conference on energy in transportation. ASHRAE Hellenic Chapter Board of Governors. 5–14. URL: https://www.ashrae.gr/Proceedings/EinT2019_Proceedings.pdf
Boullauazan, Y., Sys, C., Vanelslander, T. (2023). Developing and demonstrating a maturity model for smart ports. Maritime Policy and Management. 50(4), 447–465. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2022.2074161
Charłampowicz, J., Mańkowski, C. (2024). Environmental Process Maturity of Logistics Operators: Theoretical Aspects. European Research Studies Journal. 27(3), 3–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35808/ersj/3419
Chlomoudis, C., Kostagiolas, P., Pallis, P., Platias, C. (2024). Environmental management systems in Greek ports: A transformation tool ? Environmental Challenges. 14, 100837. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2024.100837
Dávid, A., Kļaviņš, A., Olei, A. B., Midan, A.-A. (2024). Sustainability of Maritime and Inland Ports. Cognitive Sustainability, 3(3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.55343/cogsust.119
Eide, M. S., Longva, T., Hoffmann, P., Endresen, Ø., Dalsøren, S. B. (2011). Future cost scenarios for reduction of ship CO2 emissions. Maritime Policy and Management. 38(1), 11–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2010.533711
European Commission. (2019). The European Green Deal. URL: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/resource.html?uri=cellar:208111e4-414e-4da5-94c1-852f1c74f351.0004.02/DOC_1andformat=PDF
Haezendonck, E., Van Den Berghe, K. (2020). Patterns of Circular Transition: What Is the Circular Economy Maturity of Belgian Ports ? Sustainability. 12(21), 9269. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12219269
Housni, F., Boumane, A., Rasmussen, B. D., Britel, M. R., Barnes, P., Abdelfettah, S., Lakhmas, K., Maurady, A. (2022). Environmental sustainability maturity system: An integrated system scale to assist maritime port managers in addressing environmental sustainability goals. Environmental Challenges. 7, 100481. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2022.100481
Klimek, H., Michalska-Szajer, A., Dąbrowski, J. (2019). Corporate social responsibility of the Port of Gdansk. Scientific Journals of the Maritime University of Szczecin. 59(131), 72–82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17402/354
Mańkowski, C., Charłampowicz, J. (2021). Managing maritime container ports' sustainability: A reference model. Sustainability. 13(18), 1–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810030
Notteboom, T., Lugt, L. Van Der, Saase, N. Van, Sel, S., Neyens, K. (2020). The Role of Seaports in Green Supply Chain Management: Initiatives, Attitudes, and Perspectives in Rotterdam, Antwerp, North Sea Port, and Zeebrugge. Sustainability. 12, 1688. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12041688
Olofsson, K. L., Selvakumar, P. P., Peach, K., Leon-Corwin, M., Stormer, S. A., Gupta, K., Carlson, N., Sibley, M. (2023). Effective stakeholder engagement in environmental problem-solving through group model building: An Oklahoma case study. Environmental Challenges. 13, 100755. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2023.100755
Peris-Mora, E., Diez Orejas, J. M., Subirats, A., Ibanez, S., Alvarez, P. (2005). Development of a system of indicators for sustainable port management. Marine Pollution Bulletin. 50, 1649–1660. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2005.06.048
Philipp, R. (2020). Digital readiness index assessment towards smart port development. Sustainability Management Forum. 28, 49–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00550-020-00501-5
Shi, Y., Gullett, W. (2018). International regulation on low-carbon shipping for climate change mitigation: Development, challenges, and prospects. Ocean Development and International Law. 49(2), 134–156. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00908320.2018.1442178
Sogut, Z., Erdogan, O. (2022). An investigation on a holistic framework of green port transition based on energy and environmental sustainability. Ocean Engineering. 266, 112671. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.112671