Understanding Gen Z’s Climate Anxiety: A Look at the Latest Research
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Nowadays, the widespread availability of information on climate change has made up-to-date knowledge in this area more accessible to a broad section of society. At the same time, this information overload can potentially threaten psychological well-being. In particular, a specific form of anxiety, commonly known as climate (change) anxiety, is a substantial problem. Although climate anxiety terminology only became commonplace a few years ago, the phenomenon itself has older roots. It includes several responses to climate change, the complexity of which assumes more detailed knowledge. The fact that climate disasters are becoming more common may generate intense negative emotions such as fear, depression, tension, and rage. According to current studies, stress derived from climate change is most prevalent among Generation Z. This generation group is the focus of researchers due to their outstanding environmentally conscious approach. They are possibly expected to make the most important decisions in the future, and worries about climate change may significantly influence their decisions. Researchers need to analyze the multiple causes of this phenomenon and the actions they induce. This economic literature review aims to summarize the main observations from the international literature in this field.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Open Access Policy
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access). As soon as the paper is accepted, finally submitted and edited, the paper will appear in the "OnlineFirst" page of the journal, thus from this point no other internet-based publication is necessary.
Cognitive Sustainability is an open access journal, downloading the published articles is free of charge. The Users have the right to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles in this journal, and to use them for any other lawful purpose.
Publishing Ethics
The publisher and the editors are committed to maintain high ethical standards and prevent publications where research misconduct has occurred. The authors are fully responsible for the content of their manuscript, even those parts produced by an AI tool, and are thus liable for any breach of publication ethics. In case of plagiarism or when the manuscript contains anything libellous, obscene, infringes on anyone’s copyright, right of privacy, or other rights, the publisher holds the right to reject the manuscript or publish corrections after the article has already been published. In case of any allegation of misconduct, the editor deals with the allegation appropriately. In such ethical issues, including also retractions and corrections, the COPE guidelines are followed.
Statement on the European Accessibility Act
Cognitive Sustainability is committed to inclusion and accessible design, the deliberate practice whereby a person with a disability can access our service as fully, equally and independently as a person without a disability. Our journal is working to meet the requirements set forth in the EU European Accessibility Act.
Archiving
All published papers are archived at Cognitive Sustainability Ltd. (www.cogsust.com) and in the Electronic Periodicals Archive of the National Széchényi Library (Budapest, Hungary) (https://epa.oszk.hu/05100/05129), which shall continue to maintain the database even if the Journal publishing should be terminated.
Copyrights
Cognitive Sustainability requires exclusive publishing rights but allows authors to retain any other copyright of their paper.
Privacy Statement
The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.
Those involved in editing this journal seek to be compliant with industry standards for data privacy, including the European Union's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) provision for "data subject rights" that include (a) breach notification; (b) right of access; (c) the right to be forgotten; (d) data portability; and (e) privacy by design. The GDPR also allows for the recognition of "the public interest in the availability of the data", which has a particular saliency for those involved in maintaining, with the greatest integrity possible, the public record of scholarly publishing.
References
Albrecht, G. (2011). Climate change and human well-being. Springer, New York.
Berry, H. L., Bowen, K., Kjellstrom, T. (2010). Climate change and mental health: a causal pathways framework. International Journal of Public Health. 55(2), 123–132. DOI: https://doi.org/chfmsb
Böhm, G. (2003). Emotional reactions to environmental risks: Consequentialist versus ethical evaluation. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 23(2), 199–212. DOI: https://doi.org/cmntr3
Clayton, S., Karasia, B. T. (2020). Development and validation of a measure of climate change anxiety. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 69, 101434. DOI: https://doi.org/gg5k28
CPA – Climate Psychology Alliance (2022). Climate Psychology Handbook. URL: https://www.climatepsychologyalliance.org/images/files/handbookofclimatepsychology.pdf (Downloaded: 12 February 2024)
Cunsolo, A., Harper, S. L., Minor, K., Hayes, K., Williams, K. G., Howard, C. (2020). Ecological grief and anxiety: The start of a healthy response to climate change. Lancet Planet Health. 4(7), 261–263. DOI: https://doi.org/gmq53r
Dodds, J. (2021). The psychology of climate anxiety. The British Journal of Psychiatry. 45(4), 222–226. DOI: https://doi.org/hr37
European Commission (2017). Special Eurobarometer 468: Attitudes of European citizens towards the environment. URL: https://data.europa.eu/data/datasets/s2156_88_1_468_eng?locale = en (Downloaded: 19 February 2024)
Haines, A., Kovats, R. S., Campbell-Lendrum, D., Corvalan, C. (2006). Climate change and human health: impacts, vulnerability, and public health. Public Health. 120(7), 585–596. DOI: https://doi.org/b4vzhq
Hawcroft, L. J., Milfont, T. L. (2010). The use (and abuse) of the new environmental paradigm scale over the last 30 years: a meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 30(2), 143–158. DOI: https://doi.org/cv29nt
Hickman, C., Marks, E., Pihkala, P., Clayton, S., Lewandowski, R. E., Mayall, E. E., Wray, B., Mellor, C., van Susteren L. (2021). Climate anxiety in children and young people and their beliefs about government responses to climate change: A global survey. The Lancet Planetary Health. 5(12), 863–873. DOI: https://doi.org/gn9582
Hines, J. M., Hungerford, H., Tomera, A. N. (1987). Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible environmental behavior: a meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Education. 18(2), 1–8. DOI: https://doi.org/fpqcq9
Kelly R., Elsler, L. G., Polejack, A., van der Linden, S., Tönnesson, K., Schoedinger, S. E., Santoro, F., Pecl, G. T., Palmgren, M., Mariani, P., Glithero, D., Evans, K., Cvitanovic, C., Cook, J., Bartram, J., Wisz, M. S. (2022). Empowering young people with climate and ocean science: Five strategies for adults to consider. One Earth. 5(8), 861–874. DOI: https://doi.org/m524
Kleres, J., Wettergren, A. (2017). Fear, hope, anger, and guilt in climate activism. Social Movement Studies. 16(5), 1–13. DOI: https://doi.org/gqmfvh
Leung S., Brennan, N., Freeburn, T., Waugh, W., Christie, R. (2022). Youth Survey Report 2022. Sydney, NSW: Mission Australia. URL: https://www.missionaustralia.com.au/what-we-do/research-impact-policy-advocacy/youth-survey (Downloaded: 6 February, 2024)
Martiello, M. A., Giacchi, M. V. (2010). High temperatures and health outcomes: A review of the literature. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health. 38(8), 826–837. DOI: https://doi.org/btm9gg
McIntosh, C. (ed.) (2023). Cambridge Advanced Learner’s Dictionary & Thesaurus. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Milfont, T. L. (2012). The interplay between knowledge, perceived efficacy and concern about global warming and climate change: A one-year longitudinal study. Risk Analysis. 32(6), 1003–1020. DOI: https://doi.org/ggj7dk
Noth F., Tonzer L. (2022). Understanding climate activism: Who participates in climate marches such as “Fridays for Future” and what can we learn from it? Energy Research &; Social Science. 84, 102360, 1-7. DOI: https://doi.org/m525
Ogunbode, C. A., Doran, R., Hanss, D. ..., Karasu, M. (2022). Climate anxiety, well-being, and pro-environmental action: correlates of negative emotional responses to climate change in 32 countries. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 84(18), 10187. DOI: https://doi.org/gqzfxv
Ray, S. J. (2020). A field guide to climate anxiety: How to keep your cool on a warming planet. University of California Press, Oakland. 30-51.
Stanley, S., Hogg, T. L., Leviston, Z. and Walker, I. (2021). From anger to action: Differential impacts of eco-anxiety, eco-depression, and eco-anger on climate action and well-being. The Journal of Climate Change and Health. 1, 100003. DOI: https://doi.org/gh6sd4
UNESCO (2021). Youth Climate Voices: Youth climate justice survey 2021. UNESCO. URL: https://ecounesco.ie/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/2021-Survey-report-v2_compressed.pdf (Downloaded: 12 February 2024)
UNICEF (2022). Kutatás: Hogyan gondolkoznak a fiatalok a klímaváltozásról? [Research: How young people think about climate change]. UNICEF. URL: https://unicef.hu/igy-segitunk/hireink/a-magyar-fiatalok-90-szazaleka-szorong-a-klimavaltozas-miatt (Downloaded: 12 February 2024)
USC Sustainability (2022). USC Sustainability 2028 Plan Survey: Survey Results. URL: https://sustainability.usc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/2022-USC-Sustainability-Survey-Report-8-31.pdf (Downloaded 12 February 2024)
Van Liere, K. D., Dunlap, R. E. (1980): The social bases of environmental concern: A review of hypotheses, explanations, and empirical evidence. Public Opinion Quarterly. 44(2), 181–197.
Xu, Y, Dadvand, P., Barrera-Gómez, J., Sartini, C., Marí-Dell’Olmo, M., Borrell, C., Medina-Ramón, M., Sunyer, J. and Basagaña, X. (2013). Differences in the effect of heat waves on mortality by sociodemographic and urban landscape characteristics. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. 67(6), 519–525. DOI: https://doi.org/f4wx97