Sustainability and Climate Risk Data A New Era for Investment Decision-Making in the Age of Climate Change
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
As economic actors face increasing pressure to be socially responsible and environmentally conscious, investors look beyond traditional financial metrics and seek data to support their decision-making. Measuring and reporting sustainability and climate risks is a relatively new discipline with several interrelations to economic, financial, risk management, and other cognitive study areas such as climate sciences, and have come a long way in the last couple of years. We are in the middle of the evolutionary process, as data availability and coverage are much better than a decade ago. However, there is still a lot to do until the new metrics and indicators are fully embedded in risk management frameworks and decision-making processes, similar to traditional risk measures. In our essay, we will explore the role of third-party data vendors for sustainability, ESG, and climate risk-related information, their importance in the modern investing world, and review the major challenges. We give an insight into the evolution of the market of data vendors and also the regulatory landscape. Finally, we explore the unique roles of central banks and their challenges in implementing actions in sustainability.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access). As soon as the paper is accepted, finally submitted and edited, the paper will appear in the "OnlineFirst" page of the journal, thus from this point no other internet-based publication is necessary.
References
Avetisyan, E., Hockerts, K. (2017). The consolidation of the ESG rating industry as an enactment of institutional retrogression. Busi-ness Strategy and the Environment. 26(3), 316–330. DOI: https://doi.org/f9w8rh
Blackrock (2021), European Commission, Directorate-General for Financial Stability, Financial Services and Capital Markets Union. Development of tools and mechanisms for the integration of ESG factors into the EU banking prudential framework and in-to banks’ business strategies and investment policies – Final study. Publications Office. DOI: https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2874/220248
Bokor, L. (2022). Regulatory-market trends for ESG bonds and funds and some of the associated risks for sovereigns. [in Hungarian: ESG-kötvények és -alapok szabályozói-piaci trendjei, valamint a szuverének egyes kapcsolódó kockázatai]. Financial And Economic Review. [in Hungarian: Hitelintézeti Szemle].21(4):152–181.
Cantor, R., Packer, F. (1995). The credit rating industry. The Journal of Fixed Income. 5(3), 10–34. DOI: https://doi.org/fjr6h5
de Freitas Netto, S. V., Sobral, M. F. F., Ribeiro, A. R. B., Soares, G. R. D. L. (2020). Concepts and forms of greenwashing: A systematic review. Environmental Sciences Europe. 32(1), 1–12. DOI: https://doi.org/ghckdd
European Banking Authority (EBA) (2022). Final draft implementing technical standards (ITS) on Pillar 3 disclosures on ESG risks. URL: https://www.eba.europa.eu/eba-publishes-binding-standards-pillar-3-disclosures-esg-risks
Fisher, P.G. (2020). Making the Financial System Sustainable. Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 9781108908269 p330.
Giese, G., Nagy Z., Cote, C. (2021). Constructing Net-Zero Portfolios: Three Approaches. MSCI ESG Research. URL: https://www.msci.com/www/blog-posts/constructing-net-zero/02768215423
Harper, S. (2011). Credit rating agencies deserve credit for the 2007–2008 financial crisis: An analysis of CRA liability following the enactment of the Dodd-Frank Act. Washington & Lee Law Review. 68(4). URL: https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/wlulr/vol68/iss4/8
Jacobs, B. I., Levy, K. N. (2022). The Challenge of Disparities in ESG Ratings. The Journal of Impact and ESG Investing, 2(3):107–111. DOI: https://doi.org/kg3p
Kalesnik, V., Wilkens, M., Zink, J. (2022). Do Corporate Carbon Emissions Data Enable Investors to Mitigate Climate Change? The Journal of Portfolio Management. 48(10), 119–147. DOI: https://doi.org/kg3q
Kolozsi, P. P., Ladányi, S., Straubinger, A. (2022). Measuring the Climate Risk Exposure of Financial Assets – Methodological Chal-lenges and Central Bank Practices. Financial and Economic Review. 21(1), 113–140. DOI: https://doi.org/j363
Kumar, R., Wallace, N., Funk, C. (2020). Mainstream: ESG at the Tipping Point. Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Govern-ance, January 13, 2020. URL: https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2020/01/13/into-the-mainstream-esg-at-the-tipping-point/
Lopez, C., Contreras, O., Bendix, J. (2020). Disagreement among ESG rating agencies: Shall we be worried? URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/103027/
Mähner, M. (2021). Porter’s 5 Forces, Analysis of the SaaS ESG Tracking / Reporting Industry. URL: https://silasmahner.medium.com/porters-5-forces-analysis-of-the-saas-esg-tracking-reporting-industry-15263b4eb25a
Manasses G, Tapaszti A., Paulik É (2022). Green Bond Impact Report as an indispensable next step in market development, [in Hun-garian: Zöldkötvény-hatásjelentés mint elengedhetetlen következő lépés a piaci fejlődésben]. Credit Institutions Review [in Hungarian: Hitelintézeti Szemle], 21(4):182–206. DOI: https://doi.org/kg3s
Marczis D. (2022). A 12.000 milliárd dolláros kérdés, avagy a jegybanki devizatartalékok zöldítésének dilemmái [The $12,000 billion question, or the dilemmas of greening central bank foreign exchange reserves]. Economania. URL: https://economaniablog.hu/2022/11/15/a-12-000-milliard-dollaros-kerdes-avagy-a-jegybanki-devizatartalekok-zolditesenek-dilemmai/
Mittal, R., Dordoeva, B., Ohlale, H. (2022). Mapping the ESG Landscape: Complexities, Complications and Considerations. Synechron. URL: https://www.synechron.com/sites/default/files/2022-04/Mapping-the-ESG-Landscape_TL.pdf
MNB (2022a). The Magyar Nemzeti Bank’s climate-related financial disclosure. URL: https://www.mnb.hu/letoltes/tcfd-jelente-s-2022-en.pdf
MNB (2022b). Green Finance Report. URL: https://www.mnb.hu/en/publications/reports/green-finance-report
NFRD – The Non-Financial Reporting Directive) (2014). URL: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32014L0095&from=ENhttps://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32014L0095&from=EN
Peacock, A. l, Marino I (2022). New pillar 3 ESG risks requirements to offer a partial snapshot of banks’ transition. Natixis Green and Sustainable Hub. URL: https://gsh.cib.natixis.com/api-website-feature/files/download/12246/new_pillar_3_esg_risks_requirements_to_offer_a_partial_snapshot_of_banks__transition.pdf
TCFD – Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (2022). 2022 Status Report. URL: https://assets.bbhub.io/company/sites/60/2022/10/2022-tcfd-status-report.pdf