How Does Economics Approach Nature?

Main Article Content

Gabor Kutasi


Ecological economics exists in relative isolation among the economics disciplines. This is mainly due to the difficulty which economics has in digesting the thought that the ecosystem as an entity can exist independently of human society, since the mentality of economics is based on individual utility and economic efficiency. However, the ecosystem can be integrated into the mainstream New Keynesian model, as it has been demonstrated in practice. Applying modern models, this study explores why it is difficult to change the usual approach to Nature in economics. It also examines how far the ecosystem and economics can interlock.

Article Details

How to Cite
Kutasi, G. (2022). How Does Economics Approach Nature?. Cognitive Sustainability, 1(2).


Azar, C. (1999). Weight factors in cost-benefit analysis of climate change. Environmental and Resource Economics. 13, 249–268. DOI:

Balistreri, E. J., Rutherford, T. F. (2011). Computing General Equilibrium Theories of Monopolistic Competition and Heterogeneous Firms. In: Dixon, P. B., Jorgenson, D. W. (eds). Handbook of Computable General Equilibrium Modeling. Elsevier, Amsterdam. 1513–1570. DOI:

Bank of England (2015). The Impact of Climate Change on the UK Insurance Sector: a Climate Change adaptation report by the Prudential Regulation Authority. Prudential Regulation Authority, London. (Downloaded: 23 August 2018)

Barker, T. (1998). The effects on competitiveness of coordinated versus unilateral fiscal policies reducing GHG emissions in the EU: an assessment of a 10% reduction by 2010 using the E3ME model. Energy Policy. 26(14), 1083–1098. DOI:

Berg, N., Holtbrügge, D. (1997). Wettbewerbsfähigkeit von Nationen: Der “Diamant” – Ansatz von Porter. WiSt – Wirtschaftswissenschaftliches Studium. 26(4), 199–201.

Bliss, S., Egler, M. (2020). Ecological Economics Beyond Markets. Ecological Economics 178, 106806 DOI:

Bossier, F., Bréchet, T. (1995). A fiscal reform for increasing employment and mitigating CO2 emissions in Europe. Energy Policy, 23(9), 789–798. DOI:

Boyed, J. (2007). Nonmarket benefits of nature: What should be counted in green GDP? Ecological Economics. 61(4), 716–723. DOI:

Buchanan, J. (1969). External Diseconomies, Corrective Taxes, and Market Structure. American Economic Review. 59(1), 174–177.

Buultjens, J. (2000). Excel Preliminary Economics. Pascal Press, Glebe.

Campiglio, E. (2016). Beyond Carbon pricing: the role of banking and the monetary policy in financing the transition to a low-carbon economy. Ecological Economics. 121(C), 220–230. DOI:

Cavalcanti, C. (2010). Conceptions of Ecological Economics: its Relationship with Mainstream and Environmental Economics. Estudos Avançados. 24(68), 53–67. DOI:

Coase, R. H. (1960). The problem of social cost. Journal of Law & Economics. 3, 1–44.

Cobb, C. W., Douglas, P. H. (1928). A Theory of Production. American Economic Review, 18(Supplement): 139–165.

Cooper, R. (1998). Toward a real treaty on global warming. Foreign Affairs, 77(2), 66–79.

Costanza, R. (1996). Ecological Economics: Reintegrating the Study of Humans and Nature. Ecological Applications. 6( 4), 978–990.

Dafermos, Y., Nikolaidi, M., Galanis G. (2017). Climate change, financial stability and monetary policy. Post Keynesian Economics Study Group Working Paper, No. 1712.

Dasgupta, P. (2008). Nature in Economics. Environmental and Resource Economics. 39(1): 1–7. DOI

Dasgupta, P (2009). The Place of Nature in Economic Development. SANDEE Working Papers, No. 38-09. South Asian Network for Development and Environmental Economics

Dzeraviaha, I. (2018). Mainstream economics toolkit within the ecological economics framework. Ecological Economics. 148, 15–21. DOI:

Edenhofer, O., Kalkuhl, M. (2011). When do increasing carbon taxes accelerate global warming? A note on the green paradox. Energy Policy, 39(4). 2208–2212. DOI:

Edlin, A., Karaca-Mandic, P. (2006). The Accident Externality from Driving. Journal of Political Economy. 114(5), 931–955.

Frankel, J. A. ,Rose A. K. (2005). Is Trade Good or Bad for the Environment? Sorting Out the Causality. The Review of Economics and Statistics. 87(1), 85–91.

Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1986). The Entropy Law and the Economic Process. Eastern Economic Journal. 12(1), 3–25.

Gowdy, J. M. (2017). Behavioral Economics and Climate Change Policy. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. 68(3–4), 632–644. DOI:,

Güth, W., Schmittberger, R., Scwartz, B. (1982). An experimental analysis of ultimatum game bargaining. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. 3(4), 367–388.

Hammond GP, Winnett AB. (2009). The Influence of Thermodynamic Ideas on Ecological Economics: An Interdisciplinary Critique. Sustainability. 1(4):1195-1225. DOI:

Heller, P. S. (2003). Who Will Pay? Coping with Aging Societies, Climate Change, and Other Long-Term Fiscal Challenges. International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC.

Holladay, S. (2008). Pollution from Consumption and the Trade and Environment Debate. Discussion Papers in Economics No. 08-06, Center for Economic Analysis, University of Colorado at Boulder.

Holzer, K., Cottier, T. (2015). Addressing climate change under preferential trade agreements: Towards alignment of carbon standards under the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership. Global Environmental Change. 35(1), 514–522. DOI:

House of Commons Environmental Audit Committee (2015). Environmental risks of the Trans-Atlantic Trade & Investment Partnership. House of Commons Environmental Audit Committee, London.

Jones, B., Keen, M. (2009). Climate Policy and the Recovery. IMF Staff Position Note, December 4, 2009 SPN/09/28.

Kim, Y-D., Han, H-O., Moon, Y-S. (2011). The empirical effects of a gasoline tax on CO2 emissions reductions from transportation sector in Korea. Energy Policy. 39(2), 981–989. DOI:

Kuhn, Th. S. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

Kuik O., Buchner B., Catenacci M., Gloria A., Karakaya E., Tol R. S. J. (2008). Methodological aspects of recent climate change damage cost studies. The Integrated Assessment Journal. 8(1), 9–40.

Lintz, G. (1992). Umweltpolitik und Beschäftigung. Beiträge zur Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung, Band 159. Nürnberg.

Murphy, R., Hines, C. (2010). Green quantitative easing: paying for the economy we need. Finance for the Future, Norfolk.

Nordhaus, W. D. (1992). The “DICE” model: background and structure of a Dynamic Integrated Climate-Economy model of the economics of global warming. Cowles Foundation discussion paper no. 1009. URL: (Downloaded: 18 June 2022)

Nordhaus, W. D. (2007). To tax or not to tax: alternative approaches to slowing global warming. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy. 1(1), 26–44.

Nordhaus, W. D., Yang Z. (1996). A Regional Dynamic General-Equilibrium Model of Alternative Climate-Change Strategies. American Economic Review. 86(4), 741–765.

Nye, J. V. C. (2008). The Pigou Problem. It is difficult to calculate the right tax in a world of imperfect Coasian bargains. Regulation. 31(2), 32+.|A181714162&v=2.1&it=r&sid=googleScholar&asid=a7a58f7a (Downloaded: 27 June 2022)

Paavola, J., Adger, W. N. (2005). Institutional ecological economics. Ecological Economics. 53(3), 353–368. DOI:

Pirgmaier, E. (2021). The value of value theory for ecological economics. Ecological Economics. 179(January), 106790 DOI:

Pizer, W. A. (1997). Prices vs. quantities revisited: the case of climate change. Discussion Paper, No. 98-02. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC.

Sinn, H. (2008). Public policies against global warming: A supply side approach. International Tax and Public Finance. 15(4), 360–394. DOI:

Solow, R. (1956). A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70(1): 65–94. DOI:

Spash, C. L., Smith, T (2021). The Values of Nature. Institute for Multilevel Governance and Development, Department of Socioeconomics, Vienna University of Economics and Business. URL: (Downloaded: 18 June 2022)

Swan, T. W. (1956). Economic Growth and Capital Accumulation. Economic Record, 32(2): 334–361. DOI:

UNEP-IISD (2005). Environment and Trade – A handbook. 2nd edition., UNEP-IISD, Geneve. (Downloaded: 23 August 2018)

Varian, H. R. (2010). Intermediate Microeconomics. A modern approach. 8th edition. W. W. Norton & Co., New York – London.

Most read articles by the same author(s)