Comparative analysis of organizational performance using the EFQM Excellence Model The sustainability perspective
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Given the escalating environmental challenges, it is imperative for companies to recognize the impact of their activities on the planet. By acknowledging their environmental responsibilities, organizations can develop practices and foster cultures that minimize waste and enhance value while optimizing costs and save time, thereby improving productivity. Therefore, global organizations have prioritized sustainable business practices that safeguard the environment, economy, and society. Thus, this paper seeks to conduct an in-depth analysis of the sustainability strategies employed by companies within the energy sector. To achieve a comprehensive evaluation, the study utilizes the EFQM Excellence Model criteria as a wide framework. This model provides a structured and systematic approach to examining and guiding the sustainability practices of these organizations, ensuring a thorough and detailed assessment of their efforts and outcomes. This approach aims to identify and present best practices and common pitfalls in terms of sustainability through comparative analysis. It will highlight key aspects that each analyzed organization employs to enhance organizational performance from a sustainability perspective. Through this process, a complete collection of examples will be compiled, showcasing both effective practices and common pitfalls in sustainability. These examples will function as a resource for businesses, helping them to improve their organizational performance in the field of sustainability. By learning from these case studies, organizations can adopt successful strategies and avoid common mistakes, ultimately fostering a more sustainable and efficient business environment.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access). As soon as the paper is accepted, finally submitted and edited, the paper will appear in the "OnlineFirst" page of the journal, thus from this point no other internet-based publication is necessary.
References
Balcioğlu, Y. S., Çelik, A. A., Altindağ, E. (2024). Artificial Intelligence Integration in Sustainable Business Practices: A Text Mining Analysis of USA Firms. Sustainability. 16(15), 6334. DOI: https://doi.org/nj9d
Baldassarre, L., Finken B. (2015). GE’s Real-Time Performance Development. Harvard Business Review. URL: GE’s Real-Time Performance Development (hbr.org) (Accessed on April 2024)
Chungyalpa, W. (2021). Understanding Business Sustainability: The What, the Why, and the How of Sustainable Business Practices. Indian Journal of Sustainable Development. 5(1–2), 24–37. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/352837459_Understanding_Business_Sustainability_The_What_the_Why_and_the_How_of_Sustainable_Business_Practices
Conțu, E. G. (2020). Organizational performance – theoretical and practical approaches; study on students’ perceptions. Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence. 14(1), 398–406. DOI: https://doi.org/nj9f
Eskildsen, J. K., Dahlgaard, J. J. (2000). A causal model for employee satisfaction. Total Quality Management.11(8), 1081–1094. DOI: https://doi.org/ft7k62
Fauzi, H., Svensson, G., Rahman, A. A. (2010). “Triple Bottom Line” as “Sustainable Corporate Performance”: A Proposition for the Future. Sustainability. 2(5), 1345–1360. DOI: https://doi.org/dn3nqp
Looy, A. V., Shafagatova, A. (2016). Business process performance measurement: a structured literature review of indicators, measures and metrics. SpringerPlus. 5(1), 1797. DOI: https://doi.org/ghh78p
Mixson, E. (2022). Lessons learned from GE’s Digital Transformation Failure. Intelligent Automation Network. URL: Lessons learned from GE’s Digital Transformation Failure (intelligentautomation.network)
Olaru, M., Stoleriu, G., Şandru, I. M. D. (2011). Social Responsibility Concerns of SMEs in Romania, from the Perspective of the Requirements of the EFQM European Excellence Model. Amfiteatru Economic. 13(29), 56–71.
Powering Success: Powering Success: Leadership Lessons and Stories from General Electric. (n. d.) Untitled Leader. Powering Success: Leadership Lessons and Stories from General Electric (untitledleader.com)
Santos-Vijande, M. L., Alvarez-Gonzalez, L. I. (2007). TQM and firms performance: An EFQM excellence model research based survey. International Journal of Business Science and Applied Management. 2(2), 21–41.
Severin, I. (2023/2024). Integrated Management Systems. Course Support. National University of Science and Technology POLITEHNICA Bucharest.
Severin, I., Dijmarescu, M. C., Caramihai, M. (2022). Sustainability and excellence: Pillars for business survival. In: Mori, M. (ed.), Globalization and Sustainability – Recent Advances, New Perspectives and Emerging Issues. IntechOpen. DOI: https://doi.org/nj9h
Vokony, I., Taczi, I., Szalmane Csete, M. (2020). Agile digitalization evolution in the energy sector, taking into account innovative and disruptive technologies. Renewable Energy and Power Quality Journal. 20, 584–589. DOI: https://doi.org/nj9j